RB Ex Rel. LB v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff was “not required” to appeal a hearing officer’s decision for exhaustion purposes because “there was nothing for [the] plaintiff to appeal”
• exhaustion would be \pointless\ where plaintiff prevailed at the impartial hearing, even where \she did not entirely agree with the decision of the hearing officer\
• exhaustion \pointless\ where plaintiff prevailed at the impartial hearing, even where \she did not entirely agree with the decision of the hearing officer\
• exhaustion would be \pointless\ where plaintiff prevailed at the impartial hearing
• Under the ADA or Section 504, “a plaintiff must demonstrate more than an incorrect evaluation or substantively faulty IEP to establish liability; a plaintiff must show that defendants acted with bad faith or gross misjudgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).