Raytheon Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining the Air Force's use of evaluation notices to verify offerors’ price proposals as part of an analysis on price reasonableness and realism
• noting “differential in proposed prices” between Northrop and at least Raytheon
• noting cases that involve claims for rescission or reformation of contracts
• “[B]y definition, a post-hoc rationale is any rationale that departs from the rationale provided at the time the procuring agency made its decision.”
• “As in all bid protests, the court reviews a decision to take corrective action pursuant to the standards set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (‘APA’
• Air Force notice to Raytheon and Northrop: “It is imperative the Offeror substantiate and the Govern ment fully understand any claimed initiative which the Offeror desires to incorporate into its proposed cost/price.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).