Skip to main content
· 3/7/1989

Raytheon Co. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 208 Cal. App. 3d 683
  • 256 Cal. Rptr. 425
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 185
  • 1989 WL 19546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]rit review is appropriate when [a] petitioner seeks relief from an order which may undermine a privilege.”
  • “[T]he presence of third parties does not destroy confidentiality if the disclosure was reasonably necessary to accomplish the client’s purpose in consulting counsel.”
  • “[W]rit review is appropriate when [a] petitioner seeks relief from an order which may undermine a privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Premo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.