Raytheon Co. v. Department of the Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to give preclusive effect to a Workers’ Compensation Board decision because “the workers’ compensation issues decided by the Board” were “distinct” from the issues raised in the district court proceeding
• requiring parties to arbitrate when offer letter had binding arbitration affirmation with link
• courts “must grant a motion to compel arbitration” when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is clearly entitled to arbitration as a matter of law
• courts “must grant a motion to compel arbitration” when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is clearly entitled to arbitration as a matter of law
• “[A] [c]ourt must grant a motion to compel arbitration if the pleadings, discovery materials before the [c]ourt, and any affidavits show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and it is clear the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
• “[A] [c]ourt must grant a motion to compel arbitration if the pleadings, discovery materials before the [c]ourt, and any affidavits show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and it is clear the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).