Raysoni v. Payless Auto Deals, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a merger clause expressly limiting itself to oral representations did not bar reliance on pre- contractual written representations as a matter of law
• partial merger clause was not comprehensive and did not bar reliance on written representations outside scope of merger clause
• partial merger clause was not comprehensive and did not bar reliance on written representations outside scope of merger clause
• clause stating that “NO SALESMAN VERBAL REPRESENTATION IS BINDING ON THE COMPANY” is only a partial merger clause
• partial merger clause was not comprehensive and did not bar reliance on written representations outside the scope of that merger clause
• “[W]hen one has entered a contract with a binding and comprehensive merger clause, any reliance upon precontractual representations is, generally speaking, unreasonable as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).