Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2/1/2001
Raynor v. State
Citations
- 343 Ark. 575
- 36 S.W.3d 315
- 2001 Ark. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when evidence presented a question of whether witness participated in murder as accomplice whose testimony would require corroboration, such a question of fact was appropriate for determination by jury
- when evidence presented a question of whether witness participated in murder as accomplice whose testimony would require corroboration, such a question of fact was appropriate for determination by jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-10-24· cited 49×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-10-07· cited 24×
- Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-05-21· cited 9×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-05-29· cited 8×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-12-03· cited 2×
- Bryan Porras v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2024-01-31· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.