Raynor v. Kyser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the doctrine becomes relevant when the negligence consists of a series of negligent acts or a continuing course of improper treatment
• stating that the doctrine becomes relevant when the negligence consists of a series of negligent acts or a continuing course of improper treatment
• “the active treatment of an existing patient condition ceased following ['plaintiffs] postoperative visit ” and the statute of limitations began to ran on that date
• \the active treatment of an existing patient condition ceased following [plaintiff's] postoperative visit\ and the statute of limitations began to run on that date
• continuous treatment doctrine requires “active, ongoing medical care and attention beyond the time of a specific negligent act or series of acts”; three and one-half year hiatus between visits defeats claim of continuous treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).