Raynes v. West Virginia University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that court's refusal to instruct jury that government needed to prove charged conspiracy's success did not constructively amend indictment because a conspiracy's success is not an element of charged offense
• finding no evidence in the record to support claim that a defendant dentist knew about the “different” physician billing code system
• rejecting constructive amendment claim because \[t]here was no change to the statutory elements of the offense\
• rejecting constructive amendment claim because \[t]here was no change to the statutory elements of the offense\
• “The predicate felony violation in section 1028A is simply an element of the crime of aggravated identity theft. The statute requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a felony violation, not a felony conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).