Rayner & Hope v. Dyett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal standard \is neither current nor controlling\ and that court would instead apply \a broader conception of laches used in California\
• holding that federal standard “is neither current nor controlling” and that court would instead apply “a broader conception of laches used in California”
• holding that federal standard “is neither current nor controlling” and that court would instead apply “a broader conception of laches used in California”
• same, noting \difficulty of retrial in the event that a judgment is set aside on habeas corpus many years after the conviction\
• same, noting “difficulty of retrial in the event that a judgment is set aside on habeas corpus many years after the conviction”
• \[T]he People have been prejudiced both with regard to retrying Defendant and to responding to issues raised in Defendant's petition.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).