Raymond Workmon v. Publishers Clearing House

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “MCPA and Michigan case law provide no remedy for a trade practice that is confusing only to an unreasonable person”
• the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes merely offered the opportunity to enter a contest in which the plaintiff could have won the grand prize
• the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes merely offered the opportunity to enter a contest in which the plaintiff could have won the grand prize
• the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes merely offered the opportunity to enter a contest in which the plaintiff could have won the grand prize

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).