Skip to main content
· 6/27/2003

Raymond W. Beall Hazel A. Beall v. United States

Citations

  • 336 F.3d 419
  • 92 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5001
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13189
  • 2003 WL 21480638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \review under the APA is accordingly available only where 'there is no other adequate remedy in a court.'\
  • \review under the APA is accordingly available only where 'there is no other adequate remedy in a court'\
  • \review under the APA is accordingly available only where 'there is no other adequate remedy in a court.'\ (quoting 5 U.S.C. sec. 704 )
  • “review under the APA is accordingly available only where ‘there is no other adequate remedy in a court’”
  • “review under the APA is accordingly available only where ‘there is no other adequate remedy in a court.’” (quoting 5 U.S.C. sec. 704)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Jones, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.