Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/15/1974
Raymond v. Raymond
Citations
- 165 Conn. 735
- 345 A.2d 48
- 1974 Conn. LEXIS 1065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “duty to support is wholly independent of the right of visitation”
- “[t]he needs of the child, within the limits of the financial abilities of the parent, form the basis for the amount of support required”
- ‘‘It has never been our law that support payments were conditioned on the ability to exercise rights of visitation or vice versa. The duty to support is wholly independent of the right of visitation.’’ (Footnote omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald, Bosdanski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 133×
- Cookson v. CooksonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-26· cited 86×
- Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-09-01· cited 77×
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-01-26· cited 72×
- Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-03-18· cited 61×
- Simons v. SimonsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-02-08· cited 59×
- Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-12-24· cited 54×
- Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-05· cited 49×
- Kioukis v. KioukisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-11· cited 44×
- El Idrissi v. El IdrissiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-07-26· cited 30×
- Trunik v. TrunikSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-11-27· cited 29×
- Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-05-01· cited 25×
- Foster v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-03· cited 24×
- Rempt v. RemptConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-08-27· cited 12×
- Seravo v. SeravoSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-05-26· cited 10×
- Fischer v. GoldsteinConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-05-24· cited 8×
- Sparks v. SparksWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-09-16· cited 7×
- N. R. v. M. P.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-09-03· cited 7×
- Danielson v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-03-14· cited 5×
- Milot v. MilotSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-11-01· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-08-04· cited 92×
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-23· cited 86×
- Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-05· cited 55×
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-06-25· cited 46×
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-05-22· cited 36×
- Antedomenico v. AntedomenicoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-07-05· cited 31×
- Cleveland v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-07-09· cited 28×
- Lewis v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court· 1953-11-27· cited 24×
- Thomas v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court· 1960-05-04· cited 14×
- Gaidos v. GaidosWashington Supreme Court· 1956-02-09· cited 10×
- Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1956-08-27· cited 9×
- Earl v. EarlUtah Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.