Raymond v. Ragen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in some instances the variation in the language of the two statutes requires that the statutes be construed differently from one another
• applying precursor to public improvements theft by contractor statute, the court determined “the test of a beneficiary is whether the claim is related to or grows out of the public improvement for which the money is paid or owing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).