Raymond Shipley v. City of University City University City Fire Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment where the record showed that “Shipley was able to perform a variety of jobs,” including car wash attendant, salesman, dry cleaner, and dish washer repairman, and because the City “regarded him only as unable to perform the job of firefighter”
• plaintiff not disabled although impairments prevented him from being able to perform former job as firefighter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).