Skip to main content
· 4/10/1996

Raymond Reece v. Houston Lighting & Power Company

Citations

  • 79 F.3d 485
  • 151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2936
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6992
  • 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 730
  • 1996 WL 135046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that LMRA § 301 preempted state-law claims of discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress 5 because resolution of claims would require interpretation of CBA provisions on promotion, seniority, and training assignments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barksdale, DeMOSS, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.