Raymond M. Austin v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Austin’s counsel informed the trial court that “the law ‘has been very muddled as far as what would be constitutional and what would not be’ ”
• stating that Austin’s counsel informed the trial court that “the law ‘has been very muddled as far as what would be constitutional and what would not be’ ”
• declining to review an unpre-served. claim of illegal sentence on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).