Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/12/2017

Raymond King v. Steven M. Newbold

Citations

  • 845 F.3d 866
  • 2017 WL 120896
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing a Rule 54(b) motion “filed more than thirty days after the entry of the [specific] adjudication to which it relates” (citation modified)
  • describing a Rule 54(b) motion “filed more than thirty days after the entry of the [specific] adjudication to which it relates” (citation modified)
  • “as a general rule it is an abuse of discretion for a district judge to grant a motion for a Rule 54(b) order when the motion is filed more than thirty days after the entry of the adjudication to which it relates.”
  • discussing the timing of a Rule 54(b) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.