· 12/17/1965
Raymond J. Hanifan v. The United States
Citations
- 354 F.2d 358
- 173 Ct. Cl. 1053
- 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- preference eligible employee deprived of procedural right must be regarded as not yet lawfully removed and thus entitled to his pay otherwise due
- written statements permissible but lacking “rational probative force”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cowen, Laramore, Durfee, Davis, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.