Skip to main content
· 12/17/1965

Raymond J. Hanifan v. The United States

Citations

  • 354 F.2d 358
  • 173 Ct. Cl. 1053
  • 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • preference eligible employee deprived of procedural right must be regarded as not yet lawfully removed and thus entitled to his pay otherwise due
  • written statements permissible but lacking “rational probative force”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cowen, Laramore, Durfee, Davis, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.