Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Carolina Stalite Company, (Two Cases.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a “slate gravel processing facility” placed on “property immediately adjacent to a quarry” fell under the Mine Act’s jurisdiction
• “It is clear that every company whose business brings it into contact with minerals is not to be classified as a mine .... ”
• “[W]hen appropriations measures arguably conflict with the underlying authorizing legislation, their effect must be construed narrowly.”
• the company effectively consented to an inspection under the Mine Safety and Health Act when upper-level managers, having heard the in spector’s interpretation of the statute, had ample opportunity to familiarize themselves with its procedures
• subparagraph (C) “does not require that” processing facilities “be located on property where . . . extraction occurs,” so a processing facility “immediately adjacent to a quarry” was a “mine”
• subsection (C) “does not require” that processing facilities “be located on property where . . . extraction occurs,” so a pro- cessing facility “immediately adjacent to a quarry” was a “mine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).