Raymond H. Jenkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an instruction was required because there was conflicting evidence of whether an order was direct or general
• violating operating rule constitutes evidence of contributory negligence
• violating operating rule constitutes evidence of contributory negligence
• violating operating rule constitutes evidence of contributory negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).