Skip to main content
· 3/13/1995

Raymond E. And Dorothy J. O'Bryant v. United States

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 340
  • 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1484
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “it may seem unjust” that the government could not recover the erroneous, refund in light of the “windfall” to the plaintiff
  • “The IRS’ position boils down to this: Because an assessment is merely a bookkeeping device to keep track of the tax a taxpayer owes for a given year (whether that tax has been paid or not
  • “The IRS’ position boils down to this: Because an assessment is merely a bookkeeping device to keep track of the tax a taxpayer owes for a given year (whether that tax has been paid or not
  • “The IRS’ position boils down to this: Because an assessment is merely a bookkeeping device to keep track of the tax a taxpayer owes for a given year (whether that tax has been paid or not
  • “The IRS’ position boils down to this: Because an assessment is merely a bookkeeping device to keep track of the tax a taxpayer owes for a given year (whether that tax has been paid or not
  • “The IRS’ position boils down to this: Because an assessment is merely a bookkeeping device to keep track of the tax a taxpayer owes for a given year (whether that tax has been paid or not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Kanne, Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.