Raymond Deluca v. Winer Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that parties did not dispute district court's finding that individual defendants were not personally liable under the ADA
• reasoning that the plaintiff failed his prima facie burden on disparate treatment because he relied on the allegations in his complaint instead of presenting evidence that he was treated differently than non-disabled employees
• including membership in protected class as an element of prima facie showing
• including membership in a protected class as an element of prima facie showing
• “We cannot agree that [plaintiff] would be performing the essential functions of his job with a helper.”
• not using \because of his disability\ in the prima facie case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).