Raymond D. Bowyer v. The United States Department of Air Force and Grissom Air Force Base

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that facts surrounding files that were alleged to be personal “memory refreshers” were inconsistent with the claim that they were “personal and kept private,” and therefore, “summary judgment [was] precluded”
• finding that there was a factual question as to whether memos kept by supervisor on employee, that were in fact retrieved, were somehow keyed to employee's name
• “Even though there may be no dispute over the basic facts, summary judgment is inappropriate if the parties disagree about the inferences to be drawn from those undisputed facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).