Raymond Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and United Transportation Union, Local 1594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that defendant SEPTA was created as an agency or instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and was governed by a board composed of members appointed by the Governor, mayor of Philadelphia, and county commissioners
• indicating concurrence with courts finding that section 301(a) covers supervisors’ unions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).