Raymond Boyd v. Schildkraut Giftware Corporation and D & E Trading Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that marking estoppel applies where defendant’s conduct “makes it inequitable for him to take a position contrary to his prior statements or actions”
• explaining that “deliberate mismarking” may provide grounds for applying estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).