Raymond Alton Priddy, (88-1299) v. Asher B. Edelman, Martin Warshofsky v. Fruehauf Corporation, Raymond Alton Priddy, Objector-Appellant, (88-1867)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court properly disregarded claims that were raised by the plaintiff in her brief opposing the defendant’s motion for summary judgment
• “Putting the defendants through the time and expense of continued litigation 20 on a new theory, with the possibility of additional discovery, would be manifestly unfair 21 and unduly prejudicial.”
• “A party is not entitled to wait until the discovery cutoff date has passed and a motion for summary judgment has been filed on the basis of claims asserted in the original complaint before introducing entirely different legal theories . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).