Ray v. Williams Phosphate Co.
Citations
- 59 Fla. 598
Syllabus
<p>1. A master’s deed under foreclosure proceedings in one Circuit will not be declared void in another Circuit in behalf of one not a party, but who had actual knowledge of the proceedings prior to the sale, upon allegations of fraud as between the original parties, jurisdictional facts appearing in the former case.</p> <p>2. One court of equity should not enjoin a party from proceeding in another court of equity of equal and co-ordinate jurisdiction, merely because of convenience.</p> <p>3. As between courts of co-ordinate power, the one first acquiring jurisdiction of the subject matter should as a general rule be permitted to retain it to'the end.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing order changing venue because exception to Mabie not supported by facts in record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cockrell, Hooker, Iackleford, Iill, Parki, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- BD. OF T. OF INT. IMP. TRUST F. v. Mobil OilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-04· cited 15×
- Blake v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-02-16· cited 6×
- Maddox Grocery Co. v. HaySupreme Court of Florida· 1924-05-20· cited 5×
- Triad Discount Buying Services, Inc. v. Special Data Processing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-28
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.