Ray v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellant had not been denied any meaningful “right to discovery” because the additional discovery sought would not change the outcome of the case
• ‘‘[b]efore it can be demonstrated that the attorney’s actions were the proximate cause of his damages, the plaintiff must establish his innocence’’
• the client must establish his innocence before he can demonstrate that his attorney’s actions were the proximate cause of his conviction and resulting damages
• the client must establish his innocence before he can demonstrate that his attorney's actions were the proximate cause of his conviction and resulting damages
• where the plaintiff pled guilty to criminal charges, he could not demonstrate that negligence on the part of his attorney was the proximate cause of his incarceration and alleged damages
• a Kentucky Court of Appeals case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).