Ray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• section 40-30-117(a)(2) does not provide petitioner a -4- vehicle for obtaining discovery; rather, petitioner must delineate in the motion to reopen the new scientific evidence that has already been secured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ray
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-03-06· cited 5×
• Steven Griffin v. State of Tennessee
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-07-13
• Jerry Ray, of The Estate of James Earl Ray v. State Of
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-05-16
• Darrell Wayne Taylor v. State of Tennessee
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-05-02
• Ray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-04-18
• State of Tennessee v. Connie Lee Arnold
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-01-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• James Earl Ray v. J. H. Rose, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 1976-05-10· cited 35×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1978-08-24· cited 18×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-02-24· cited 3×