Ray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he mere fact that someone other than the State has by artificial means filled in this portion of the river bed does not change its status as river bed land.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brainard v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 2000-01-06· cited 128×
• Cox v. City & County of Dallas Levee Improvement Dist.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1953-03-27· cited 19×
• State v. Bonelli Cattle Company
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-04· cited 17×
• City and County of Dallas Levee Imp. Dist. v. Carroll
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1953-11-06· cited 14×
• Peterson v. Morton
  D. Nevada· 1979-01-31· cited 7×
• Wilemon v. City & County of Dallas Levee Imp. Dist.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1953-12-16· cited 4×
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1971-07-02
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1949-07-02