Skip to main content
· 3/26/1984

Ray v. South Carolina National Bank, Inc.

Citations

  • 314 S.E.2d 359
  • 281 S.C. 170
  • 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol evidence is competent to show an independent agreement so long as the oral agreement does not contradict or vary the written one
  • where terms of written instrument are unambiguous, clear and explicit, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to contradict, vary or explain its terms, in absence of fraud in its procurement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw, Bell, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.