Ray v. Ray (In Re Ray)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court is persuaded that even under the best market conditions, the sale price for the land might be sufficient to satisfy the liens, but there would not be a substantial recovery for plaintiff’s creditors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Bernard Persky and Stuart Persky, Debtors. Community National Bank and Trust Company of New York v. Stuart Persky and Ronnie Persky
  Second Circuit· 1989-12-22· cited 58×
• Yoppolo v. Schwenker (In Re Ziegler)
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-10-02· cited 12×
• Harkins v. Oswald (In Re Oswald)
  N.D. West Virginia· 1988-08-11· cited 8×
• Hunter v. Levesque (In Re McCoy)
  N.D. Ohio· 1988-10-13· cited 8×
• Spear v. Crow Canyon Office Park Partners (In Re Haley)
  N.D. California· 1989-05-09· cited 2×
• In Re Kam
  D. Hawaii· 1989-10-05· cited 1×
• Bell v. McLemore
  M.D. Tennessee· 2018-11-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morris v. Ivey (In Re Morris)
  N.D. Georgia· 1981-04-06· cited 16×
• Zoltanski v. Brown (In Re Brown)
  N.D. Ohio· 1983-08-19· cited 11×
• Kepler v. Atkinson (In Re Atkinson)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1986-06-20· cited 8×