Ray v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Thompson to affirm the exclusion of Dr. Loring's expert testimony that the defendant \could not form the requisite intent to commit the crimes charged because she suffered from PTSD\
• relying on Thompson to affirm the exclusion of Dr. Loring’s expert testimony that the defendant “could not form the requisite intent 44 to commit the crimes charged because she suffered from PTSD”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).