Ray v. Mangum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where conflicting testimony exists, one party's unspoken assumptions and beliefs are not clear evidence that other party agreed
• stating party asserting equitable defenses must demonstrate them by “clear and compelling evidence”
• allowing equitable defense against a petition to enforce spousal maintenance decree
• “Where conflicting testimony exists and the parties’ unspoken assumptions and intentions conflict, one party’s belief cannot provide clear and convincing evidence of the parties agreement.”
• “Where conflicting testimony exists and the parties’ unspoken assumptions and intentions conflict, one party’s belief [that the other waived child support] cannot provide clear and compelling evidence of [a waiver].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).