Ray v. Glidden Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an inability to perform continuous, heavy lifting or an inability to perform a particular job do not necessarily constitute a record of disability
• holding that inability to continuously lift containers weighing on average 44-56 pounds \does not render a person substantially limited in the major life activities of lifting or working\
• \[I]nability to perform heavy lifting does not render a person substantially limited in the major activities of lifting or working.\
• inability to continuously lift 10 to 56 pound containers insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish a significant limitation of the major life activity of working
• plaintiff’s inability to perform continuous heavy lifting did not constitute a substantial limitation on a major life activity
• plaintiff not substantially impaired by limitation on heavy lifting where he otherwise could lift and reach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).