Skip to main content
· 5/30/1963

Ray v. City of Birmingham

Citations

  • 154 So. 2d 751
  • 275 Ala. 332
  • 1963 Ala. LEXIS 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding substantial compliance with pre-suit notice statute where the plaintiff’s technically deficient notice did not interfere with the purpose of the statute, which was “to enable the [defendant] to investigate and determine the merits of the claim”
  • finding substantial compliance with pre-suit notice statute where the plaintiff’s technically deficient notice did not interfere with the purpose of the statute, which was “to enable the [defendant] to investigate and determine the merits of the claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simpson, Livingston, Merrill, Harwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.