Ray v. Alexandria Mall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amended petition may not add a wholly new and unrelated defendant, “since this would be tantamount to asserting a new cause of action which would have been otherwise prescribed”
• holding that an amended petition may not add a wholly new and unrelated defendant, \since this would be tantamount to asserting a new cause of action which would have been otherwise prescribed\
• noting that Louisiana law models the federal rule and that relation back does not apply when adding a new defendant
• noting that Louisiana law models the federal rule and that relation back does not apply when adding a new defendant
• noting that Louisiana law models the federal rule, and that relation back does not apply when adding a new defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).