Skip to main content
· 6/27/1974

Ray-O-Vac Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 14 Pa. Commw. 47
  • 321 A.2d 731
  • 1974 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the private attorney general doctrine is one of the “equitable exceptions to the American Rule that ‘each party is responsible for paying his or her own litigation expenses’”
  • noting that “all of the citizens of the state, present and future, stood to 74 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** benefit from the decision”
  • plaintiffs challenged the decision of a tribunal in an adversarial setting rather than an established government policy or action
  • “[t]his court has recognized a number of equitable exceptions to the ‘American [r]ule’ ”
  • \[t]his court has recognized a number of equitable exceptions to the `American [r]ule.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mencer, Rogers, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.