Skip to main content
· 5/18/1984

Ray L. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 735 F.2d 267
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22357
  • 5 Soc. Serv. Rev. 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if a claimant has the residual functional capacity to meet the exertional requirements for [light work], the regulations acknowledge that ‘non-ex-ertional’ limitations—such as ‘mental, sensory, or skin impairments’ ...—may make application of the Guidelines improper.”
  • Medical-Vocational Guidelines can be used as guidance even when not determinative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.