· 3/19/1974
Ray L. Glenny v. American Metal Climax, Inc., and Amax Lead & Zinc, Inc.
Citations
- 494 F.2d 651
- 18 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1132
- 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- absent parties would be prejudiced through continued adjudication against its parent company because plaintiff requested the court close down absent party’s operation
- “we must determine the importance of each factor on the facts of each particular case and in light of equitable considerations. In making this determination we recognize that operation of Rule 19(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Barrett, Doyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.