Rawls v. Early

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that woven rattan imports were not baskets because they were designed for use as patio furniture
• finding that woven rattan imports were not baskets because they were designed for use as patio furniture
• considering use in eo nomine classifications where it is included in the definition of the merchandise at issue
• considering “use” of the imported product where the product is defined as merchandise “used for the purpose of holding, protecting, or carrying any commodity”
• considering use to determine whether “certain rattancore, woven articles” are baskets
• \use cannot be ignored in determining whether an article falls within an eo nomine tariff provision\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).