Skip to main content
· 8/31/2000

Rawls Springs Utility Dist. v. Novak

Citations

  • 765 So. 2d 1288
  • 2000 Miss. LEXIS 203
  • 2000 WL 1231546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the utility district board’s president could not bind the board absent authorization or other action by the board on the minutes
  • holding that the utility district board’s president could not bind the board absent authorization or other action by the board on the minutes
  • holding that the utility district board’s president could not bind the board absent authorization or other action by the board on the minutes
  • holding that an agreement not included in the minutes of a public board ‘render[s] the agreement void’
  • holding that an agreement not included in the minutes of a public board “render[s] the agreement void” (emphasis added)
  • “The District Board is a public corporation ... and is ‘a body politic and corporate with power of perpetual succession.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banks, P.J., Waller and Diaz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.