Rawlinson v. Whitney National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that while the results of a previous proceeding did not collaterally estop the plaintiff from relitigating her claims of race discrimination, she was “collaterally estopped from relitigating whether she committed” the misconduct underlying her termination
• applying McDonnell Douglas to determine whether the plaintiff had shown by a preponderance of the evidence that her race was a motivating factor for challenged employment decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).