Rawlinson v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N. V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In addition to the explicit good cause requirement of Rule 16(b), when deciding whether or not to allow a party to amend a deadline set in the scheduling order, the court should also consider the potential prejudice to the non-movant.”
• “In addition to the explicit good cause requirement of Rule 16(b), when deciding whether or not to allow a party to amend a deadline set in the scheduling order, the court should also consider the potential prejudice to the non-movant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).