Rawlins v. Georgia
Citations
- 201 U.S. 638
- 26 S. Ct. 560
- 50 L. Ed. 899
- 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1760
Syllabus
<p>If the state constitution and laws in regard to selection of jurors, as construed by the' state court, are consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, this court can go no further, and will not revise the decision of the state court as to whether the local law has been complied with.</p> <p>There is nothing in the Fourteenth' Amendment which prevents a State from excluding and exempting from jury duty certain classes on the bona -fide ground that it is for the good of the community that their regular work should not be interrupted.</p> <p>Even when persons liable to jury duty under the state laws are excluded it is no ground for challenge to the array, if a sufficient number of unexceptionable persons are present.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Fourteenth Amendment does not prevent excluding certain classes from jury duty for the good of the community
- venire excluding lawyers, ministers, doctors, dentists, railway engineers and firemen not unconstitutional
- approving statutory exemption for lawyers, ministers, doctors, and railroad engineers
- approving statutory exemption for lawyers, ministers, doctors, and railroad engineers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-06-09· cited 1,162×
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1908-11-09· cited 773×
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court· 1946-05-20· cited 744×
- Peters v. KiffSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 657×
- Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 489×
- Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 446×
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1926-11-01· cited 401×
- United States v. ButeraFirst Circuit· 1970-01-21· cited 145×
- Buchalter v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1943-06-01· cited 137×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1968-10-29· cited 134×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-09· cited 134×
- Berna v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-06-04· cited 131×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-01-04· cited 111×
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1964-09-18· cited 93×
- Orzell Billingsley, Sr., C. Herbert Oliver, J. S. Phifer and Abraham Woods, Jr. v. George W. ClaytonFifth Circuit· 1966-04-05· cited 69×
- George v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1952-05-23· cited 66×
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1914-11-14· cited 62×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.