Ravindranathan v. Virginia Commonwealth University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that VCU was not required to bear the burden of presenting evidence that the plaintiff was not a domiciliary of Virginia
• holding that the circuit court in Richmond was correct in refusing to reweigh the evidence presented at the administrative proceeding
• holdingthat the circuit court cannot reweigh the evidence and is limited in its review to determine whether the university’s actions were “arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise contrary to law.” (quoting Va. Code Ann. § 23-7.4:3)
• finding university's denial of in-state tuition was supported by evidence and was not unreasonable
• university’s denial of in-state tuition was supported by substantial evidence and was not unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).