· 3/12/2004
Ravichandran Shivaraman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Citations
- 360 F.3d 1142
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714
- 2004 WL 444882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- faulting the BIA for creating a rule that “allows for an IJ’s exercise of unbounded discretion with disparate effects and drastic immigration consequences”
- distinguishing Rosas-Ramirez on the basis that Rosas-Ramirez had originally entered the country illegally
- “We review de novo an agency’s construction of a statute that it administers, subject to established principles of defer- ence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Reinhardt, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.