RAVELO BY RAVELO v. County of Hawaii

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Raveio and wife had a claim under the promissory estoppel doctrine, where they detrimentally relied on the county's assurance of employment at a definite time
• police officer and spouse who quit their jobs in one county, moved and changed their children's school, in reliance of offer of employment which was later rescinded, alleged a cause of action under promissory estoppel
• Ravelo and wife quit jobs and made plans to move household

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).