· 6/4/1992
Ravalli County Bank v. Gasvoda
Citations
- 253 Mont. 399
- 49 State Rptr. 488
- 833 P.2d 1042
- 1992 Mont. LEXIS 147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘The District Court did not adhere to Rule 52(a), M.R.Civ.P., when it failed to specify the grounds for the summary judgment ruling with sufficient particularity. Therefore, we remand this case to the District Court with instructions to proceed in accordance with this opinion.’!
- “The District Court did not adhere to Rule 52(a), M.R.Civ.P., when it failed to specify the grounds for the summary judgment ruling with sufficient particularity. Therefore, we remand this case to the District Court with instructions to proceed in accordance with this opinion.”
- ‘The District Court did not adhere to Rule 52(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison, Turnage, Gray, Hunt, McDonough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.