Rauzin v. Kupper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that petitioners failed to convince PUC that customer education programs were not a reasonable alternative to price regulation
• noting that the Choice Act \expressly requires the PUC to administer [low-income programs such as the CAP] in a manner that is cost-effective for both the CAP participants and the non-CAP participants\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).